Work Sharp Precision Adjust Knife Sharpener
SKU: 73983413035

Work Sharp Precision Adjust Knife Sharpener

Sale price$157.05 Regular price$174.50
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Work Sharp Precision Adjust Knife SharpenerHighlights Professional grade knife sharpening system with sturdy metal construction and digital angle indicator. Adjustable sharpening angles from 15 to 30 for precision and versatility. Includes a range of seven abrasive grits: 220, 320, 400, 600, 800 diamond, fine ceramic, and leather strop. Innovative V Block Clamp for secure and repeatable knife positioning. Features a small knife table attachment for sharpening pen knives and other small blades.

Highlights
  • Professional-grade knife sharpening system with sturdy metal construction and digital angle indicator.
  • Adjustable sharpening angles from 15° to 30° for precision and versatility.
  • Includes a range of seven abrasive grits: 220, 320, 400, 600, 800 diamond, fine ceramic, and leather strop.
  • Innovative V-Block Clamp™ for secure and repeatable knife positioning.
  • Features a small knife table attachment for sharpening pen knives and other small blades.
Description

The Professional Precision Adjust is a top-tier knife sharpening system designed to bring unparalleled precision to your sharpening routine. This system is crafted with a robust metal construction and equipped with a digital angle indicator that allows easy adjustment of the sharpening angle between 15° and 30°. Suitable for kitchen knives, pocket knives, hunting knives, and outdoor knives, it caters to a broad range of sharpening needs.

The sharpener includes seven abrasive grits, providing a comprehensive sharpening solution from quick edge restoration with diamond plates to final honing and polishing with a ceramic plate and leather strop. The unique V-Block Clamp™ ensures knives are securely and consistently positioned, while the weighted base stabilizes the sharpener during use. The added small knife table attachment expands its utility by accommodating smaller blades, making it truly versatile.

Specifications

Product Dimensions: 203mm L x 168mm W x 247mm H
Product Weight: 4.6 kg
Product Code: WSBCHPAJ-PRO-I
SKU: WSBCHPAJ-PRO-I
Barcode: 662949041553
Brand: WORK SHARP
Shipping Weight: 4.6 kg
Shipping Dimensions: 300mm W x 210mm H x 420mm L
Shipping Volume: 0.02646 m³
Type: Sharpener
Model: WORK SHARP Professional Precision Adjust Knife Sharpener
Sharpening Angle: Adjustable from 15° to 30° in 1° increments

What’s in the Box?
  • Abrasive Handle & Rod with Ceramic Serration Sharpening Rod
  • Diamond Abrasives in 220, 320, 400, 600, & 800 grits
  • Fine Ceramic Abrasive & Leather Strop
  • Digital Angle Indicator
  • Clamp Support
  • Small Knife Sharpening Table
  • Organiser for Accessories
User Manual and Demonstration Videos

For detailed instructions on how to use the Professional Precision Adjust Knife Sharpener, please view the user manual video:

Explore additional features and sharpening techniques in this video:

Product User Guide

Download the comprehensive user guide for the Professional Precision Adjust Knife Sharpener here: Professional Precision Adjust User Guide (PDF).

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 73983413035

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 2265 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
erika
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

recommand products