Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
hs7011 c t p4s ul fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0191841660000 Gewicht: 383 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 90,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 18,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 18,00 C 15 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0. 41 Innenmae: mm 55,00 P4S Boundary
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0191841660000 |
| Gewicht: 383 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 90,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 18,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 18,00 |
| C 15° Contact Angle |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.41 |
| Innenmaße: mm 55,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 17900 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 11500 |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 187 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 1.225 N |
| Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 18,7 mm |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 62 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 42,2 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 91,1 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 11.500 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 17.900 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 1.210 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 17.900 N |
| E tk max 70,3 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 68,5 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 70,3 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 65,9 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 1.210 N |
| F V H 374 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 62 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 1.225 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 187 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 70,3 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 0,6 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 65,9 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 68,5 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 1,1 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 11.500 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 62 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 374 N |
| a 18,7 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze |
| c a H 91,1 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 42,2 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 62 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 0,6 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 1,1 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 0,391 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 2258 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
New favorite lip balm!
Excellent lip treatment. Doesn’t cause breakouts like some balms do for me. Soothes chapped lips well. Bought for my whole family!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
So Much Better than Every Other Lip Balm
It’s a little pricey, but the best lip balm I’ve ever tried. It is lightweight, moisturizes excellently, and keeps my lips soft and comfortable. I used to use Nivea but it was heavy and greasy, and I had to apply it much more often. I’ve also tried La Mer. This is just as good but only a fraction of the price.
I first bought this when I was doing Accutane. If you’ve ever been through that experience, you know your lips are miserable for months on end, and you have to apply lip balm every fifteen minutes. I tried a dozen cheaper lip balms, but finally decided to try this. It is sooo much better. I could go over an hour without feeling uncomfortable.
Even when I’m not doing Accutane, I have very sensitive lips. During the winter I have to apply other lip balms every hour. With this one I only have to apply every four hours. If I forget to bring it with me, I can go all day without my lips feeling too bad.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 1, 2023
★★★★★ 4
Lip barrier repair not just protection
I've tried avene, okeefes, aquaphor, and this is my favorite. I use adaplene gel to treat my acne and have increased my use to daily. My skin tolerated it well but my lips became very dry (even trying to avoid adaplene gel from getting on my lips), especially on the lip line. I've been looking for a lip balm that repairs the skin, not just protects it and this is my favorite. I apply it less than the others and it works the best. I like aquaphor but I think it is more protecting instead of repair. When I was searching for a lip balm I used the ordinary barrier support serum which worked but is not as convenient/easy to apply as an actual lip balm.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Best lip balm I’ve ever used.
I love LRP’s nutritic lip balm. I don’t know if the LRP makes it anymore but I can still get it from Amazon. I’ve used LRP’s products in the past and have always been very happy with the results. I don’t have troubled skin. I’m just a guy that doesn’t want to spend large sums of money on face soap and lotion. If it were up to me I’d still be using my multiwash product to wash everything head to toe, the floor, bathroom toilet and my car. But some years ago a girl I was dating begged me to start thinking about my skin. So I took her advice, we broke up but I still heed her advice and take some consideration for skin care. It’s I like nutritic because it’s light and smooth and doesn’t have any strong feminine scents. I use this twice a day like clock work. Once in the morning before I leave the house and once when I come home after I’ve showered, ready to jump into bed. The way the balm comes out is like a woman’s lipstick. The balm is inside a tube and there is a mechanism that spins the balm up ready for application. I like to retract all the way so the edge of the cover doesn’t smoosh into the balm. It’s a little pricey for a lip balm (IMO) but I think it’s worth it. I will use this for 6-9 months. That’s twice a day everyday. Oh I don’t slather it on. It’s one swipe on the upper lip and one swipe on the lower lip.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2020
★★★★★ 3
Lip Balm
La Roche-Posay Nutritic Lip Balm is an okay product. It’s definitely not horrible, and it does what a lip balm is supposed to do. It keeps lips soft and moisturized, and it feels comfortable to wear.
That said, I’m a big fan of La Roche-Posay in general, and this one didn’t really stand out to me. I didn’t notice anything special that justified the price, and honestly, I feel like I could get similar results from a much cheaper lip balm. It works, but for the price point, I don’t think it was worth it for me.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 20, 2025