Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 4 - Jul 9
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
B7217-E-T-P4S-UL FAGTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0191572150000 7217ACDGA P4A Gewicht: 1850 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmierffnung Spannung: geringe Spannung Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 150,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 28,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 28,00 E 25 Contact Angle ECLASS number 23 05 08 03 ECLASS2 number 23 05 08 03 Einzelgewicht in (kg): 1. 8 Innenmae: mm 85,00 P4S
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0191572150000 7217ACDGA/P4A |
| Gewicht: 1850 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Schmierkanal: nicht vorhanden Schmieröffnung |
| Spannung: geringe Spannung |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 150,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 28,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 28,00 |
| E 25° Contact Angle |
| ECLASS number 23-05-08-03 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-08-03 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 1.8 |
| Innenmaße: mm 85,00 |
| P4S Boundary Dimensions ISO 4, Abec-7, Running Accuracy ISO 2, Abec-9 |
| Paarung G – Universelle Paarung |
| Präzision P4S Präzision (Höher als P4) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 93000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 57000 |
| T Textile Laminated Phenolic Resin, Outer Ring Guided. The Cage Is Suitable For Long-Term Operation At Temperatures Up To 100°C |
| UL Single Bearing, Universal, Light Preload |
| Abhebekraft leicht: 2.520 N |
| Abhebekraft schwer: 18.466 N |
| Abstand Druckkegelspitze: 41,5 mm |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung: h12 |
| Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter: 98 mm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit leicht: 233 N/µm |
| Axiale Steifigkeit schwer: 497 N/µm |
| Betriebstemperatur max.: 100 °C |
| Betriebstemperatur min.: -30 °C |
| C 0r 57.000 N Statische Tragzahl, radial |
| C r 93.000 N Dynamische Tragzahl, radial |
| C ur 5.500 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial |
| Dynamische Tragzahl, radial: 93.000 N |
| E tk max 113,2 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk min 106,6 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 max 113,2 mm Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| E tk1 min 106,6 mm Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, radial: 5.500 N |
| F V H 5.921 N Vorspannkraft schwer |
| F V L 864 N Vorspannkraft leicht |
| K aE H 18.466 N Abhebekraft schwer |
| K aE L 2.520 N Abhebekraft leicht |
| Maximaler Einspritzteilkreis: 113,2 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 1 mm |
| Maximaler Freistichradius: 2 mm |
| Minimaler Einspritzteilkreis: 106,6 mm |
| Minimaler Kantenabstand: 2 mm |
| Statische Tragzahl, radial: 57.000 N |
| T max 100 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| Vorspannkraft leicht: 864 N |
| Vorspannkraft schwer: 5.921 N |
| a 41,5 mm Abstand Druckkegelspitze |
| c a H 497 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit schwer |
| c a L 233 N/µm Axiale Steifigkeit leicht |
| d =a 98 mm Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter |
| d =a h12 Anlagedurchmesser Wellenschulter Passung |
| r 1 min 2 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r a max 2 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r a1 max 1 mm Maximaler Freistichradius |
| r min 2 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 1,782 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1085 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Cute shoes
Size: 9, Color: Bronze
Fits small
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Charlie’s Angel Steppers
Size: 7, Color: Black, Size: 7, Color: Black
These Beauties 😍 are grown women heels that can only be worn for a short while, Lordt, they are taxing on the arches and the the front of the shoe is very narrow so if you have a wide foot, Please reconsider or take some time to break these babies in. However, these are the Charlie Angels no one will be able to stop complimenting you on the quality and material of the shoes with that leather finished look , most heels are a very plastic or suede material, these took me back in time and that alone was steal for the price point
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Gorgeous
Size: 9, Color: Tan
These are so pretty! I ended up returning these because they were so tall and I couldn’t walk in them as good as I thought I was going to be able to. Besides that, they fit true to size and were comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
great!
Size: 6, Color: Black Patent
beautiful! fit great! i couldn’t decide between this one and another pair so i kept both!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 4, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Wouldn’t recommend these sandals.
I was really excited to try the Steve Madden Women's Wafer Heeled Sandals, but unfortunately, I’m disappointed with the quality. The sandals look great in photos, but when I received them, I noticed that the materials felt cheap and not as durable as I expected from a brand like Steve Madden. The straps are stiff, and they rubbed against my skin, causing discomfort after only a short amount of time.
The fit also wasn’t great — they felt a bit tight, especially around the toes, which made them hard to wear for longer periods. While the heel height is cute, the overall construction doesn’t seem to provide enough support, which made walking in them less comfortable than I anticipated.
For the price, I expected better quality and comfort. Unfortunately, I wouldn’t recommend these sandals.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2025